Regimentation at the cost of individualism?
The topic of public health is one that comes up often in my Impact of Epidemic Disease in European History class. In particular preventative public health, for example vaccination, has been discussed often. Many times my professor has talked about the responsibility of a government to provide basic health to its citizens.
But he also mentions that the result of this: regimentation, lack of choice. In order for a government to provide health to its citizens, the citizens are at the mercy of the government. You do what the state tells you to, and you really have no choice.
I’ve spent the last months living in a country that is completely based on social welfare. Everything is subsidized by the government. The tax rate is high (50-60% income tax). The government is a daily part of life in Denmark. I don’t often hear Danes complaining about the taxes, mostly my fellow students complaining about the 25% sales tax.
The Danes are happy people- the happiest in the world as one study shows. But it is my opinion this has come at the cost of individualism and choice. Perhaps why this country is so cute at times is that everything is the same, regimentized. The basis of Danish society is that everyone is at the same level. No one should have more or be better.
These ideas fall on the complete opposite of the American society- where individualism is encouraged, and many strive to have more and be better.
Is there a middle ground? Can we have a society with choice and individualism, which is also equal and orderly?
As I have learned while here in Denmark, it is ok to simply say...
I don’t know.
My analysis is purely anecdotal. I have no sociological background. I simply have lived in two drastically different cultures. I have also studied the American & Danish medical systems, and have had personal experiences with both.
There is a lot to learn from Denmark, after all it claims to be the worlds oldest monarchy. But I think that Denmark can also learn a bit from the States.
Anyways, I was just thinking….
Anna
But he also mentions that the result of this: regimentation, lack of choice. In order for a government to provide health to its citizens, the citizens are at the mercy of the government. You do what the state tells you to, and you really have no choice.
I’ve spent the last months living in a country that is completely based on social welfare. Everything is subsidized by the government. The tax rate is high (50-60% income tax). The government is a daily part of life in Denmark. I don’t often hear Danes complaining about the taxes, mostly my fellow students complaining about the 25% sales tax.
The Danes are happy people- the happiest in the world as one study shows. But it is my opinion this has come at the cost of individualism and choice. Perhaps why this country is so cute at times is that everything is the same, regimentized. The basis of Danish society is that everyone is at the same level. No one should have more or be better.
These ideas fall on the complete opposite of the American society- where individualism is encouraged, and many strive to have more and be better.
Is there a middle ground? Can we have a society with choice and individualism, which is also equal and orderly?
As I have learned while here in Denmark, it is ok to simply say...
I don’t know.
My analysis is purely anecdotal. I have no sociological background. I simply have lived in two drastically different cultures. I have also studied the American & Danish medical systems, and have had personal experiences with both.
There is a lot to learn from Denmark, after all it claims to be the worlds oldest monarchy. But I think that Denmark can also learn a bit from the States.
Anyways, I was just thinking….
Anna












